Bug 1307172 - Duplicate package
Summary: Duplicate package
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-livereload
Version: 24
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Orphan Owner
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-02-12 22:17 UTC by William Moreno
Modified: 2016-06-22 10:07 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-06-22 10:07:37 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description William Moreno 2016-02-12 22:17:59 UTC
How can say it.... well I have livereload packaged since 2015 as:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/livereload/

Both have the same source.

Comment 1 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2016-02-15 05:55:59 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 2 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2016-02-15 06:03:09 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 3 Parag Nemade 2016-02-15 06:11:09 UTC
Well, its our packaging guidelines which do not states pypi sources should be packaged with prefix "python-". So one can package it with or without "python-" prefix. 

But there is following written in naming guidelines of python 
"Packages of python modules (thus they rely on python as a parent) use a slightly different naming scheme. They should take into account the upstream name of the python module. This makes a package name format of python-$NAME."

Sundeep,
   Please retire your package as "livereload" already in Fedora. Wish fedora-review could have catch this in its evaluation. While I reviewed this package I could not find any way to find "livereload" package.
Follow, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

Comment 4 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2016-02-15 06:18:32 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 5 Sundeep Anand 2016-02-15 06:38:12 UTC
Sorry, I was following https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030755 and hence the mistake. Retiring https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-livereload/

Comment 6 William Moreno 2016-02-15 14:45:49 UTC
In my first try to package this lib I was going for python-livereload with python2 and python3 support, but reviewer request to remane to livereload and only support python3, do you need python2 support? livereload provides python3-livereload and I can provide python2-livereload, this is not a big issue, do you want to comanintaing the package?

Comment 7 William Moreno 2016-02-15 14:47:22 UTC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230968#c6

Comment 8 Matthias Runge 2016-02-15 17:50:31 UTC
Shouldn't the other livereload package being renamed properly? My reasoning would be, it's primarily a library, where the package also provides an executable script.

Comment 9 Matthias Runge 2016-02-15 17:50:45 UTC
Filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308681

Comment 10 Jan Kurik 2016-02-24 14:31:00 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle.
Changing version to '24'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora24#Rawhide_Rebase


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.