Bug 130773

Summary:	postinstall depmod should be in GFS-modules package
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Cluster Suite	Reporter:	Derek Anderson <danderso>
Component:	gfs	Assignee:	Kiersten (Kerri) Anderson <kanderso>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	GFS Bugs <gfs-bugs>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	3
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2004-09-29 20:00:45 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Derek Anderson 2004-08-24 16:17:01 UTC

Description of problem:
Version: 6.0.0-10

When GFS was split from a single package to two packages (one for
modules) the postinstall scriptlet for 'depmod -a' remained with the
GFS binaries package.  This no longer does anything to benefit the
user; they need to manually depmod (or reboot) after install since the
install order is GFS, then GFS-modules.  So this postinstall scriptlet
should probably be moved to the GFS-modules package.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
GFS-6.0.0-10

How reproducible:
Yes.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Remove all GFS packages
2. Install GFS-6.0.0 package
3. Install GFS-modules-6.0.0 package
4. Run modprobe on a GFS module


Actual results:
modprobe: Can't locate module foo


Expected results:
Module loads.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Derek Anderson 2004-08-24 16:18:05 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 130772 ***

Comment 2 David Lawrence 2004-09-29 20:00:45 UTC

An errata has been issued which should help the problem 
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being 
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, 
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report 
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2004-490.html