Bug 130773 – postinstall depmod should be in GFS-modules package

Bug 130773 - postinstall depmod should be in GFS-modules package

Summary:	postinstall depmod should be in GFS-modules package

Status:	CLOSED ERRATA

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Cluster Suite
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	gfs (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	3
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Kiersten (Kerri) Anderson
QA Contact:	GFS Bugs
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2004-08-24 12:17 EDT by Derek Anderson
Modified:	2010-01-11 21:57 EST (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2004-09-29 16:00:45 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

External Trackers
Tracker	ID	Priority	Status	Summary	Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata	RHBA-2004:490	normal	SHIPPED_LIVE	Updated GFS packages	2004-09-29 00:00:00 EDT

Groups: None (edit)

Description Derek Anderson 2004-08-24 12:17:01 EDT

Description of problem:
Version: 6.0.0-10

When GFS was split from a single package to two packages (one for
modules) the postinstall scriptlet for 'depmod -a' remained with the
GFS binaries package.  This no longer does anything to benefit the
user; they need to manually depmod (or reboot) after install since the
install order is GFS, then GFS-modules.  So this postinstall scriptlet
should probably be moved to the GFS-modules package.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
GFS-6.0.0-10

How reproducible:
Yes.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Remove all GFS packages
2. Install GFS-6.0.0 package
3. Install GFS-modules-6.0.0 package
4. Run modprobe on a GFS module


Actual results:
modprobe: Can't locate module foo


Expected results:
Module loads.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Derek Anderson 2004-08-24 12:18:05 EDT


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 130772 ***

Comment 2 David Lawrence 2004-09-29 16:00:45 EDT

An errata has been issued which should help the problem 
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being 
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, 
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report 
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2004-490.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.