Bug 1327308

Summary:	[DOCS] Docs barely make reference to the ability to specify PV by name
Product:	OpenShift Container Platform	Reporter:	Eric Jones <erjones>
Component:	Documentation	Assignee:	Adela <amelicha>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Vikram Goyal <vigoyal>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:	Vikram Goyal <vigoyal>
Priority:	medium
Version:	3.1.0	CC:	ahardin, aos-bugs, bvincell, jokerman, mmccomas, rhowe
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-08-23 18:13:18 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Eric Jones 2016-04-14 18:03:27 UTC

Document URL: 
[0] https://docs.openshift.com/enterprise/3.0/dev_guide/persistent_volumes.html
[1] https://docs.openshift.com/enterprise/3.1/rest_api/kubernetes_v1.html#v1-persistentvolumeclaimspec

Section Number and Name: 
[0] Using Persistent Volumes
[1] PersistentVolumeClaimSpec

Describe the issue: 
Doc [1] makes reference to all three of the variables you can use when making a PVC. [0] describes PVC and includes examples but only makes use of 2/3 of the variables. 

Suggestions for improvement: 
The only place to find the `volumeName` variable is in [1] when it should also be found in [0].

Comment 1 Brennan Vincello 2016-04-15 01:14:34 UTC

Pull requested a fix, Adds volumeName and fixes link #1907 https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/1907

Comment 2 Brennan Vincello 2016-04-16 03:14:27 UTC

Duplicate fix for 3.1, Adds volumeName #1910 https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/1910

Comment 3 Ryan Howe 2016-04-18 22:17:35 UTC

Defining pvc.Spec.VolumeName does not guarantee PVC get bound to PV. 
 
See bug 
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328278

Comment 4 Ashley Hardin 2016-06-02 14:50:13 UTC

*** Bug 1276084 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Thien-Thi Nguyen 2016-06-02 16:07:47 UTC

Brennan,
Thanks for your patience on this BZ.  I think https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/1907 is on the brink of merge (just a small nit to fix), but https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/1910 needs to be closed and a new one open that targets branch 'master'.  WDYT?

Comment 7 Thien-Thi Nguyen 2016-08-02 16:05:41 UTC

This BZ is satisfied by two commits on branch ‘enterprise-3.0’:
3f38668132397e8bafdebdbd27744239660e41f9
71fb66d0ea55b5e023f9cb035ef7edd28ad0f341
and the PR on branch ‘master’ (to be cherry-picked to branches ‘enterprise-3.1’, ‘enterprise-3.2’, ‘dedicated-3.2’, ‘online’):
https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/2597

The original PRs (1907, 1910) have been closed.

Moving status to RELEASE_PENDING.

Comment 9 Ashley Hardin 2016-08-23 18:13:18 UTC

Content is now published:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/openshift-enterprise/3.2/single/developer-guide/#requesting-storage

Comment 10 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 03:21:09 UTC

The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days