Document URL: [0] https://docs.openshift.com/enterprise/3.0/dev_guide/persistent_volumes.html [1] https://docs.openshift.com/enterprise/3.1/rest_api/kubernetes_v1.html#v1-persistentvolumeclaimspec Section Number and Name: [0] Using Persistent Volumes [1] PersistentVolumeClaimSpec Describe the issue: Doc [1] makes reference to all three of the variables you can use when making a PVC. [0] describes PVC and includes examples but only makes use of 2/3 of the variables. Suggestions for improvement: The only place to find the `volumeName` variable is in [1] when it should also be found in [0].
Pull requested a fix, Adds volumeName and fixes link #1907 https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/1907
Duplicate fix for 3.1, Adds volumeName #1910 https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/1910
Defining pvc.Spec.VolumeName does not guarantee PVC get bound to PV. See bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328278
*** Bug 1276084 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Brennan, Thanks for your patience on this BZ. I think https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/1907 is on the brink of merge (just a small nit to fix), but https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/1910 needs to be closed and a new one open that targets branch 'master'. WDYT?
This BZ is satisfied by two commits on branch ‘enterprise-3.0’: 3f38668132397e8bafdebdbd27744239660e41f9 71fb66d0ea55b5e023f9cb035ef7edd28ad0f341 and the PR on branch ‘master’ (to be cherry-picked to branches ‘enterprise-3.1’, ‘enterprise-3.2’, ‘dedicated-3.2’, ‘online’): https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/2597 The original PRs (1907, 1910) have been closed. Moving status to RELEASE_PENDING.
Content is now published: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/openshift-enterprise/3.2/single/developer-guide/#requesting-storage
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days