Bug 132912
Summary: | No additional IP addresses at ethX without aliased devices | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla> | ||||
Component: | initscripts | Assignee: | Bill Nottingham <notting> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 14 | CC: | dr, poptix, rvokal, triage | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
URL: | http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2003-November/msg01122.html | ||||||
Whiteboard: | bzcl34nup | ||||||
Fixed In Version: | initscripts-9.23-1 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2010-12-02 19:32:10 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 150221, 150223 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Robert Scheck
2004-09-19 14:21:32 UTC
ifconfig man page: add addr/prefixlen Add an IPv6 address to an interface. del addr/prefixlen Remove an IPv6 address from an interface. These are IPv6 only commands. Adding additional IPv4 addresses is not currently possible without using aliased interfaces (eth0:x). This is an upstream kernel feature enhancement request. NO, it's definitely NOT an upstream kernel feature request - it's already possible and now ;-) The old ifconfig is already obsoleted and shouldn't be used any longer. The current tool for IP configuration is /sbin/ip out of the iproute2 package. And iproute2 supports more than one IPv4 address per interface without using aliased interfaces. Maybe you also should have a look to bug #132925 and #134816. You are correct the ip command will add secondary addresses to an interface. Unfortunately this does not display in ifconfig which _is_ used everywhere else. This should be filed against net-tools to update ifconfig, make it announce that it's deprecated, or remove it entirely. Although I don't see it going away anytime soon, and addresses hidden from ifconfig will cause confusion. Created attachment 112252 [details]
initscripts-8.05-rsc-linux.patch
A worse hack, but still working for me for months now - and the syntax format
should also be no problem for system-config-network...
And Matthew, you always should prefer iproute2 rather ifconfig, the confusion
by the users will hide after some time. It's always the same with new things
;-)
*** Bug 113455 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Any hope for FC5? I guess not, since my patch is more a hack as a patch and nobody of the Red Hat/Fedora folks is able and/or willing to provide a clean solution. Same is at bug #132925, but it looks like that it has a chance for FC10 ;-) We are close to releasing /etc/net 0.8.0, which will be tried to be packed for Fedora Core/Extras. Multiple addresses just work. I hope it helps. Denis, that sounds great, but will it really receive Fedora Core or will it only packaged for Fedora Extras...Bill? So, if it will be just a package in Fedora Extras instead of replacing the current stuff in Core, it isn't the solution I (and maybe lots of other people) really would like to see. I will let know when there is anything to show. There is nothing in Extras ATM and I'm not making hope about Core. Ping...any chance for FC6? I am trying to continue my work. Robert, as long as FC6 is expected to be freezed today, there seems to be no chance, but here is what I managed to do ATM: #195353 #195365 I hope it helps. Denis, it is only freeze of devel 1 of FC6 (as per http://fedoraproject.org/ wiki/Core/Schedule). Package looks nice in general, but you should review it using rpmlint (also in Extras). Redefining mandirs inside of the spec file is not what is likely seen, IIRC. But discussion should moved to the corresponding bug reports now... Well, Fedora 10 is not such far away now...Bill! :) Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported against rawhide during the development of a Fedora release that is no longer maintained. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained. If this bug remains in NEEDINFO thirty (30) days from now, we will automatically close it. If you can reproduce this bug in a maintained Fedora version (7, 8, or rawhide), please change this bug to the respective version and change the status to ASSIGNED. (If you're unable to change the bug's version or status, add a comment to the bug and someone will change it for you.) Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again. Hum? Since when is Rawhide no longer maintained? The problem still exists in Rawhide. Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 11 development cycle. Changing version to '11'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping This message is a reminder that Fedora 11 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 11. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '11'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 11's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 11 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping The problem still exists in Rawhide. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 14 development cycle. Changing version to '14'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping In the waaaaay waaaay late and hopefully better than never department. http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=initscripts.git;a=commitdiff;h=ff5befb95b133cc1da3f32ffcd9f3cef779244b6 |