Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.

Bug 134864

Summary: gnome-bluetooth-manager doesn't start on 64b platforms
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Zack Cerza <zcerza>
Component: gnome-bluetoothAssignee: Harald Hoyer <harald>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: alan
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: gnome-bluetooth-0.5.1-5.FC3.1 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-12-07 11:08:13 EST Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 131589    

Description Zack Cerza 2004-10-06 16:23:25 EDT
% gnome-bluetooth-manager 
/usr/bin/python: can't open file
'/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gnomebt/manager.py'
% ls /usr/lib*/python2.3/site-packages/gnomebt/manager.py
/usr/lib64/python2.3/site-packages/gnomebt/manager.py

gnome-bluetooth-manager puts its python stuff in /usr/lib64 but
hardcodes /usr/lib/ in the source.

'/lib/' occurs on 142 lines in the upstream source, and a few times in
our patches. Ouch. Can the python stuff be moved to /usr/lib/ ?
Comment 1 Harald Hoyer 2004-10-25 05:37:56 EDT
*** Bug 136994 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Dan Williams 2004-10-31 23:21:47 EST
Zack, can you test with current gnome-bluetooth-0.5.1-5 in FC-3?  A
patch for this issue got put in on Oct 8th...  Is it still a problem?
Comment 3 Zack Cerza 2004-11-01 11:40:22 EST
Yeah, it's still a problem.

In /usr/bin/gnome-bluetooth-manager:
exec /usr/bin/python /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gnomebt/manager.py

$ rpm -ql gnome-bluetooth | grep manager.py
/usr/lib64/python2.3/site-packages/gnomebt/manager.py

$ rpm -q gnome-bluetooth
gnome-bluetooth-0.5.1-5.x86_64

I don't see the fix in the spec file or upstream changelog...
Comment 4 Zack Cerza 2004-12-06 17:42:29 EST
Uh, ping?
Comment 5 Harald Hoyer 2004-12-07 06:24:16 EST
yes, yes :) I am on it :) RHEL4 is fixed, FC3 update version prepared
yesterday.