Bug 1373725
Summary: | A dialog box pops up and can't be closed normally when drag a file into guest with filetransfer disabled. | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Fangge Jin <fjin> | ||||
Component: | spice | Assignee: | Default Assignee for SPICE Bugs <rh-spice-bugs> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | SPICE QE bug list <spice-qe-bugs> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 7.3 | CC: | cfergeau, dblechte, dyuan, juzhou, mxie, mzhan, rbalakri, rduda, tpelka, tzheng, victortoso, xiaodwan | ||||
Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||
OS: | All | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | spice-0.13.90-1.el7 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | |||||||
: | 1373830 (view as bug list) | Environment: | |||||
Last Closed: | 2018-04-10 13:52:38 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Fangge Jin
2016-09-07 04:37:07 UTC
There are two problems: 1. the dialog showing up & transfer going on - spice server should tell spice-gtk, that file transfer is disabled 2. the dialog window cannot be closed - that is virt-viewer's problem Created attachment 1198587 [details]
The screenshot of virt-viewer
(In reply to Pavel Grunt from comment #2) > There are two problems: > 1. the dialog showing up & transfer going on - spice server should tell > spice-gtk, that file transfer is disabled > 2. the dialog window cannot be closed - that is virt-viewer's problem I opened the bug 1373830 for 2. (In reply to Pavel Grunt from comment #2) > There are two problems: > 1. the dialog showing up & transfer going on - spice server should tell > spice-gtk, that file transfer is disabled > 2. the dialog window cannot be closed - that is virt-viewer's problem The dialog showing up, but the transfer has no progress, which can be seen from the screenshot (In reply to JinFangge from comment #5) > (In reply to Pavel Grunt from comment #2) > > There are two problems: > > 1. the dialog showing up & transfer going on - spice server should tell > > spice-gtk, that file transfer is disabled > > 2. the dialog window cannot be closed - that is virt-viewer's problem > > The dialog showing up, but the transfer has no progress, which can be seen > from the screenshot Yes, it has no progress because the file transfer is disabled in spice-server. Patch posted - for server to tell spice-gtk that file transfer should not happen https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/2016-December/034736.html *** Bug 1446142 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Fix did not get upstream, moving to 7.5 All should be upstream now: * Spice-protocol Shortlog: agent: Add capability for disabled file transfer Commit : 3f27d410b45262829897227abf64d57a81ff4910 Pavel Grunt on Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:43:21 +0100 Shortlog: agent: Add macro for clearing capability Commit : b9bfbd2f7bc14274bb84364e9fd75e1448e3eaf5 Pavel Grunt on Fri, 3 Mar 2017 13:00:36 +0000 * Spice Shortlog: reds: Adjust agent capabilites to disabled features Commit : 366b5b96c21579156b6ef5601d6d458899269d99 Pavel Grunt on Tue, 6 Jun 2017 17:53:42 +0100 * Spice-gtk Shortlog: main: Handle disabled file transfer Commit : 40b0dbf3175ed8c5dba7f5a8058774c3aec93d9c Pavel Grunt on Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:24:28 +0100 Fixed as part of the rebase, should be fixed client-side with the rebase to spice-gtk 0.34. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:0802 |