Bug 1394799

Summary: [RFE] Expose Infra provider networks (RHOS) in host/node details
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine Reporter: Ronnie Rasouli <rrasouli>
Component: ProvidersAssignee: Andrey <aveselov>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Ido Ovadia <iovadia>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5.7.0CC: aveselov, iovadia, jfrey, jhajyahy, jhardy, lavenel, maufart, obarenbo, rrasouli, simaishi, tzumainn
Target Milestone: MVPKeywords: FutureFeature, RFE, TestOnly, ZStream
Target Release: 5.10.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: openstack
Fixed In Version: 5.10.0.17 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1496883 1552739 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-02-11 13:55:46 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: Openstack Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1496883, 1552739    

Description Ronnie Rasouli 2016-11-14 13:19:25 UTC
Description of problem:

In node details relationships such as in instance relationships 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
5.7.0.10

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:
Expose the network details on infra provider nodes

Additional info:

Comment 2 Tzu-Mainn Chen 2017-06-27 21:39:51 UTC
Looking at the ironic introspection data, there's a lot of possible network information to get.  keystone_admin_api_network (ctlplane), a ton of xxxxx_api_networks (internal_api), storage networks, etc.  What were you hoping to see listed... ?

Comment 3 Ronnie Rasouli 2017-07-09 11:25:53 UTC
Same as instance view, network components on node view

Comment 4 Tzu-Mainn Chen 2017-07-10 13:11:44 UTC
Can you be more specific? To minimize confusion, can you give an example CLI query and highlight the information you'd want?

Comment 5 Tzu-Mainn Chen 2017-07-18 14:56:04 UTC
*** Bug 1471213 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 Andrey 2018-01-22 15:40:51 UTC
Ronnie,  I see in https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/pull/2028 the link for NetworkManager was added to InfraProvider view, not for Node view. Is that correct? Could you clarify pls.

Comment 9 Jad Haj Yahya 2018-01-25 12:13:10 UTC
According to Ronni, it should be for node view, not only InfraProvider view

Comment 10 Ido Ovadia 2018-01-25 14:58:34 UTC
(In reply to Andrey from comment #8)
> Ronnie,  I see in https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/pull/2028
> the link for NetworkManager was added to InfraProvider view, not for Node
> view. Is that correct? Could you clarify pls.

The RFE asks to expose network details on each Infra node.

I wish to see all networks which connected to the node, such as:
external, storage, ctlplane, internal_api etc.

For example we can see this info on:
openstack stack show overcloud

Comment 11 Andrey 2018-01-26 13:23:08 UTC
> I wish to see all networks which connected to the node, such as:
> external, storage, ctlplane, internal_api etc.
> 
> For example we can see this info on:
> openstack stack show overcloud

This should solve the issue: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/pull/3315

Comment 13 Jad Haj Yahya 2018-05-28 09:31:18 UTC
HI

I think the intention was to add fields of networks and subnets not only link to NetworkManager. In instances there is no link to NetworkManager but there is links to networks and subnets

Comment 14 Andrey 2018-05-30 09:01:01 UTC
PR is out https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/pull/4003, added networks and subnets links

Comment 16 Jad Haj Yahya 2018-11-19 10:55:17 UTC
Verified on 5.10.0.24