Bug 1394799 - [RFE] Expose Infra provider networks (RHOS) in host/node details
Summary: [RFE] Expose Infra provider networks (RHOS) in host/node details
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Providers
Version: 5.7.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: MVP
: 5.10.0
Assignee: Andrey
QA Contact: Ido Ovadia
URL:
Whiteboard: openstack
: 1471213 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 1496883 1552739
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-11-14 13:19 UTC by Ronnie Rasouli
Modified: 2019-02-11 13:55 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 5.10.0.17
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1496883 1552739 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-02-11 13:55:46 UTC
Category: ---
Cloudforms Team: Openstack
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ronnie Rasouli 2016-11-14 13:19:25 UTC
Description of problem:

In node details relationships such as in instance relationships 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
5.7.0.10

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:
Expose the network details on infra provider nodes

Additional info:

Comment 2 Tzu-Mainn Chen 2017-06-27 21:39:51 UTC
Looking at the ironic introspection data, there's a lot of possible network information to get.  keystone_admin_api_network (ctlplane), a ton of xxxxx_api_networks (internal_api), storage networks, etc.  What were you hoping to see listed... ?

Comment 3 Ronnie Rasouli 2017-07-09 11:25:53 UTC
Same as instance view, network components on node view

Comment 4 Tzu-Mainn Chen 2017-07-10 13:11:44 UTC
Can you be more specific? To minimize confusion, can you give an example CLI query and highlight the information you'd want?

Comment 5 Tzu-Mainn Chen 2017-07-18 14:56:04 UTC
*** Bug 1471213 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 Andrey 2018-01-22 15:40:51 UTC
Ronnie,  I see in https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/pull/2028 the link for NetworkManager was added to InfraProvider view, not for Node view. Is that correct? Could you clarify pls.

Comment 9 Jad Haj Yahya 2018-01-25 12:13:10 UTC
According to Ronni, it should be for node view, not only InfraProvider view

Comment 10 Ido Ovadia 2018-01-25 14:58:34 UTC
(In reply to Andrey from comment #8)
> Ronnie,  I see in https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/pull/2028
> the link for NetworkManager was added to InfraProvider view, not for Node
> view. Is that correct? Could you clarify pls.

The RFE asks to expose network details on each Infra node.

I wish to see all networks which connected to the node, such as:
external, storage, ctlplane, internal_api etc.

For example we can see this info on:
openstack stack show overcloud

Comment 11 Andrey 2018-01-26 13:23:08 UTC
> I wish to see all networks which connected to the node, such as:
> external, storage, ctlplane, internal_api etc.
> 
> For example we can see this info on:
> openstack stack show overcloud

This should solve the issue: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/pull/3315

Comment 13 Jad Haj Yahya 2018-05-28 09:31:18 UTC
HI

I think the intention was to add fields of networks and subnets not only link to NetworkManager. In instances there is no link to NetworkManager but there is links to networks and subnets

Comment 14 Andrey 2018-05-30 09:01:01 UTC
PR is out https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/pull/4003, added networks and subnets links

Comment 16 Jad Haj Yahya 2018-11-19 10:55:17 UTC
Verified on 5.10.0.24


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.