Bug 1446665
| Summary: | ERROR: bi_list(): (5) Input/output error | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Vikhyat Umrao <vumrao> |
| Component: | RGW | Assignee: | Matt Benjamin (redhat) <mbenjamin> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | shilpa <smanjara> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | Erin Donnelly <edonnell> |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 2.2 | CC: | cbodley, ceph-eng-bugs, edonnell, hnallurv, kbader, mbenjamin, owasserm, sweil, tserlin, uboppana, vakulkar |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | 2.3 | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | RHEL: ceph-10.2.7-14.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph_10.2.7-16redhat1 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
.bi-list operations now perform as expected
Previously, the addition of new bucket index key ranges for multi-site replication induced an unintended bucket index entry decoding problem in the `bi-list operation`, which is now used during bucket resharding. Consequently, bucket resharding failed when multi-site replication was used.
The logic has been changed in the `bi-list` operation to resolve this bug, and `bi-list` operations can be performed as expected when multi-site replication is used.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-06-19 13:32:35 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1437916 | ||
|
Description
Vikhyat Umrao
2017-04-28 14:30:15 UTC
Verified on ceph-radosgw-10.2.7-16 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:1497 |