Bug 1451442

Summary: [3.2.0_async] [RHEL6] gdeploy has to be rebuilt to be compatible with ansible 2.3
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage Reporter: Sachidananda Urs <surs>
Component: gdeployAssignee: Sachidananda Urs <surs>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Manisha Saini <msaini>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rhgs-3.2CC: amukherj, asrivast, knarra, msaini, rcyriac, rhinduja, rhs-bugs, sasundar, smohan, storage-qa-internal, surs
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: ZStream
Target Release: RHGS 3.2.0 Async   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: gdeploy-2.0.1-13 Doc Type: Release Note
Doc Text:
Feature: gdeploy is updated to work with Ansible 2.3. Reason: Current version of ansible has removed the support for extras/ module directory in their version 2.3. gdeploy used to ship the modules which were placed in this directory. Playbook conditional was changed in Ansible 2.3, playbooks for gdeploy had to be modified to accommodate these changes. Result: gdeploy installer was modified to install the modules in search path. And the playbooks updated to work with Ansible release.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1450320 Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-05-25 17:03:55 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1449217, 1450320    
Bug Blocks:    

Comment 3 Manisha Saini 2017-05-25 09:33:13 UTC
Verified this bug with

gdeploy-2.0.1-13.el6rhs 
ansible-2.3.0.0-3.el6

Comment 4 SATHEESARAN 2017-05-25 12:00:10 UTC
HC doesn't uses RHEL 6 platform for host.
Based on comment3 marking this bug as verified

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2017-05-25 17:03:55 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:1332