Bug 1451832

Summary: Deleted labels still show up in CFME after provider refresh
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine Reporter: Tony <ashlifst>
Component: UI - OPSAssignee: Dan Clarizio <dclarizi>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Gilad Shefer <gshefer>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 5.8.0CC: cpelland, epacific, fsimonce, gshefer, hkataria, jhardy, mpovolny, obarenbo
Target Milestone: GAKeywords: TestOnly, ZStream
Target Release: 5.9.0   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: container
Fixed In Version: 5.9.0.1 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1469666 1472383 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-03-06 15:32:41 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: Container Management Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1469666, 1472383    
Attachments:
Description Flags
openshift_describe_output
none
Screenshot of the object after refresh
none
cfme_log none

Description Tony 2017-05-17 15:23:56 UTC 
Description of problem:



Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create some labels for multiple objects in Openshift (pods, nodes, etc)

2. Add the provider to CFME (I tested it with the fresh CFME appliance but it could also be done with the already existing provider)

3. Verify the newly created labels are visible in CFME

4. Delete some labels in Openshift, then do "oc describe..." to verify the labels were successfully deleted. 

5. Refresh the provider in CFME and wait 3-5 minutes. 

6. Check the objects with the deleted labels.




Actual results:

The deleted labels are still visible in CFME


Expected results:

The deleted labels should not be displayed
Comment 2 Tony 2017-05-17 15:25:10 UTC 
Created attachment 1279747 [details]
openshift_describe_output
Comment 3 Tony 2017-05-17 15:27:00 UTC 
Created attachment 1279748 [details]
Screenshot of the object after refresh
Comment 4 Tony 2017-05-17 15:29:19 UTC 
Created attachment 1279750 [details]
cfme_log
Comment 5 Einat Pacifici 2017-05-17 17:27:48 UTC 
Federico, I noticed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436132
Is this BZ one instance of the above BZ i.e. refresh provider doesn't refresh directly?
Comment 6 Federico Simoncelli 2017-05-18 09:09:42 UTC 
(In reply to Einat Pacifici from comment #5)
> Federico, I noticed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436132
> Is this BZ one instance of the above BZ i.e. refresh provider doesn't
> refresh directly?

Indeed they could be related.
Assigning this to Zahi that is already working on bug 1436132.
Comment 7 zakiva 2017-06-01 15:08:23 UTC 
https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/15182