Bug 1451832 - Deleted labels still show up in CFME after provider refresh
Summary: Deleted labels still show up in CFME after provider refresh
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: UI - OPS
Version: 5.8.0
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: GA
: 5.9.0
Assignee: Dan Clarizio
QA Contact: Gilad Shefer
URL:
Whiteboard: container
Depends On:
Blocks: 1469666 1472383
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-05-17 15:23 UTC by Tony
Modified: 2018-03-06 15:32 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 5.9.0.1
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1469666 1472383 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-03-06 15:32:41 UTC
Category: ---
Cloudforms Team: Container Management
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
openshift_describe_output (2.53 KB, text/plain)
2017-05-17 15:25 UTC, Tony
no flags Details
Screenshot of the object after refresh (129.12 KB, image/png)
2017-05-17 15:27 UTC, Tony
no flags Details
cfme_log (332.12 KB, text/plain)
2017-05-17 15:29 UTC, Tony
no flags Details

Description Tony 2017-05-17 15:23:56 UTC
Description of problem:



Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create some labels for multiple objects in Openshift (pods, nodes, etc)

2. Add the provider to CFME (I tested it with the fresh CFME appliance but it could also be done with the already existing provider)

3. Verify the newly created labels are visible in CFME

4. Delete some labels in Openshift, then do "oc describe..." to verify the labels were successfully deleted. 

5. Refresh the provider in CFME and wait 3-5 minutes. 

6. Check the objects with the deleted labels.




Actual results:

The deleted labels are still visible in CFME


Expected results:

The deleted labels should not be displayed

Comment 2 Tony 2017-05-17 15:25:10 UTC
Created attachment 1279747 [details]
openshift_describe_output

Comment 3 Tony 2017-05-17 15:27:00 UTC
Created attachment 1279748 [details]
Screenshot of the object after refresh

Comment 4 Tony 2017-05-17 15:29:19 UTC
Created attachment 1279750 [details]
cfme_log

Comment 5 Einat Pacifici 2017-05-17 17:27:48 UTC
Federico, I noticed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436132
Is this BZ one instance of the above BZ i.e. refresh provider doesn't refresh directly?

Comment 6 Federico Simoncelli 2017-05-18 09:09:42 UTC
(In reply to Einat Pacifici from comment #5)
> Federico, I noticed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436132
> Is this BZ one instance of the above BZ i.e. refresh provider doesn't
> refresh directly?

Indeed they could be related.
Assigning this to Zahi that is already working on bug 1436132.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.