Bug 1596377

Summary: [RFE] When deleting a provider with associated Migration Plan or Infrastructure mapping, the plan and mappings should also be deleted
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine Reporter: Kedar Kulkarni <kkulkarn>
Component: UI - OPSAssignee: Brett Thurber <bthurber>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Kedar Kulkarni <kkulkarn>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5.9.0CC: cpelland, hkataria, kkulkarn, lavenel, mpovolny, obarenbo, smallamp
Target Milestone: GAKeywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: 5.9.4Flags: kkulkarn: automate_bug+
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: v2v
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1598476 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-08-08 14:34:28 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1598476, 1601090    

Description Kedar Kulkarni 2018-06-28 17:56:34 UTC
Description of problem:
Infra Mappings and Migration Plans should be deleted if any of the associated provider(RHV or VMware) is deleted, because 
1)if you delete a provider and add it back, the mappings and plans associated with it previously may not work. 
2)if there is no provider, then migration is not possible



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 2 Dave Johnson 2018-06-28 18:02:15 UTC
Please assess the impact of this issue and update the severity accordingly.  Please refer to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity for a reminder on each severity's definition.

If it's something like a tracker bug where it doesn't matter, please set the severity to Low.

Comment 3 Sudhir Mallamprabhakara 2018-07-03 19:45:55 UTC
*** Bug 1596374 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Sudhir Mallamprabhakara 2018-08-08 14:34:28 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1612154 ***