Bug 16222
| Summary: | LC_CTYPE from enviroment is ignored, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | noa <noa-redhat-bugzilla> | ||||
| Component: | gnupg | Assignee: | Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||
| Version: | 7.0 | CC: | dr | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | i386 | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2000-08-16 14:56:47 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
noa
2000-08-15 09:45:08 UTC
Created attachment 2496 [details]
a patch that fixes the problem
This will be fixed in gnupg-1.0.2-2. Thanks! sorry to come with bad news, but i had an email discussion with Werner Koch (gnupg maintainer) and he notified me that some function calls in the gnupg source depend on the LC_CTYPE locale being set to C (notably isalpha() and friends). I will work to get a better patch and come back to you then. Aaargh. Reverting the patch. Hm. Now the 1.0.4 RPMs contain the following patch:
#ifdef ENABLE_NLS
- #ifdef HAVE_LC_MESSAGES
- setlocale( LC_TIME, "" );
- setlocale( LC_MESSAGES, "" );
- #else
- setlocale( LC_ALL, "" );
- #endif
bindtextdomain( PACKAGE, G10_LOCALEDIR );
textdomain( PACKAGE );
+ setlocale( LC_ALL, "" );
#endif
Is that really correct/needed? Nalin, could you please shed some light what the
effect of that change is? Is it a RH-only abnormally? If not, why did Werner not
fix this since 1.0.2?
BTW: does Werner know about the strlen fix?
- && !strcmp(fname+strlen(defhome+1)-strlen(defhome+1),
+ && !strcmp(fname+strlen(fname)-strlen(defhome+1),
*** Bug 24342 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Just double-checked my sent-mail folder. We sent the patch to wk on 10/19, so yes, it should show up in a forthcoming release. |