Bug 164270
| Summary: | libcdio-0.74-2.fc4 causes dependency conflict with updated libcddb | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Sven Wahl <svenwahl> |
| Component: | libcdio | Assignee: | Adrian Reber <adrian> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 4 | CC: | alex, extras-qa, furryball, gbcox, hafflys, paul |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | libcdio-0.75-3.fc4 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2005-07-28 08:26:17 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Sven Wahl
2005-07-26 14:10:03 UTC
Build request for the new libcdio is already in the queue to be build and should be available soon. Due to the circular build dependency of libcdio and libcddb, what's the right order with which to process the build requests? I've moved the requests to the top of the tobuild file, in hope that the order speeds up the builds when feeding them to the new build system. But I'm not sure the circular dependency is trouble-free. Thoughts? e.g. for FE devel, the new libcdio-0.75-1.fc5 breaks the ABI with libcddb-1.0.2-2 Error: Missing Dependency: libcdio.so.5 is needed by package libcddb Error: Missing Dependency: libcdio.so.5(CDIO_5) is needed by package libcddb For FC4 that would mean: first update libcddb, then libcdio. But for devel? One of the packages has to be build two times. This is either libcddb or libcdio. As libcddb has been build first in the FC-4 branch it has to be rebuild again after libcdio has been build. The main problem is that libcdio depends on libcdio and libcdio depends on libcddb. So now libcdio has to be rebuild and if there is not again an ABI break between libcddb 1.1.0 and libcddb 1.2.0 it should be enough if libcddb is build after libcdio. We (Anvil and I) tried to coordinate the upgrade of both libraries but it seems that our efforts didn't work pretty good. Please take a look at the top of the current tobuild file and sort the requests as needed. The build system might choke on trying to install what's in the FE4 repo currently. I changed the order in the tobuild file. You are probably right that the buildsystem will choke when trying to install the build dependencies. It would be necessary to request a build of libcdio without the dependency on libcddb and if this succeeds another build with the dependency enabled will be required. I will now wait what the buildsystem reports on the build request and if it fails I will request another build as described above. *** Bug 164319 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 164349 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** And indeed has the buildsystem choked on the build of libcdio-0.75-2.fc4 as it can be seen in: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs//4/3-libcdio-0.75-2.fc4/ I have now a buildrequest for libcdio-0.75-3.fc4 in the queue without requiring libcddb. Interestingly, libcddb-1.2.0-1.fc4 built successfully, but only because via libcdio-devel it pulled in the older libcddb-1.0.2-2 instead of the current libcddb-1.1.0-1.fc4. Okay, now libcdio has been rebuild, but libcddb has been build against the old version of libcdio. libcddb has now to be rebuilt. I will try to reach the maintainer. This is now fixed. Packages from external repositories using these libraries (libcdio, libcddb) have to be now also rebuilt. (In reply to comment #12) > This is now fixed. Great job, Adrian! Thanks a lot for your efforts! > Packages from external repositories using these libraries > (libcdio, libcddb) have to be now also rebuilt. On my installation that is vcdimager-0.7.21-0.lvn.1.4 and xine-lib-1.0.1-0.lvn.10.4 from the rpm.livna.org repository. Anyone of you who has an account at http://bugzilla.livna.org/ and would care about requesting a rebuild? (In reply to comment #13) > On my installation that is > > vcdimager-0.7.21-0.lvn.1.4 and > xine-lib-1.0.1-0.lvn.10.4 > > from the rpm.livna.org repository. Anyone of you who has an account at > http://bugzilla.livna.org/ and would care about requesting a rebuild? These packages have now been rebuilt as vcdimager-0.7.21-0.lvn.2.4 and xine-lib-1.0.1-0.lvn.11.4 making the update of libcdio and libcddb flawless. |