Bug 164389
| Summary: | ant needs to obsolete ant-jmf | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dennis Gilmore <dennis> |
| Component: | ant | Assignee: | Deepak Bhole <dbhole> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | katzj |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 1.6.5-1jpp_9fc | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2006-06-07 19:38:24 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Dennis Gilmore
2005-07-27 16:11:15 UTC
Are you sure that you mean "ant-bsf" and not "ant-jmf"? Your reported error message says: Missing Dependency: ant =0:1.6.2-3jpp_10fc is needed by package ant-jmf The error message is correct. The "jmf" subpackage of "ant" has been recently removed. This prevents the upgrade of ant. That's a bug which will be fixed. I just want to figure out whether or not you've run into something else entirely. To help me figure this out, can you confirm that what you manually removed was "ant-BSF" rather than "ant-JMF"? There has never been an "ant-bsf" package to my knowledge. *** Bug 164786 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** We never shipped "ant-bsf". I'm changing the summary from ant-apache-bsf needs to obsolete ant-bsf to ant needs to obsolete ant-jmf See bug 164786 comment #2. Yes sorry i meant ant-jmf i messed up when i after removing ant-jmf yum installed ant-apache-bsf Has already been fixed in 1.6.5-1jpp_9fc. |