Bugzilla (bugzilla.redhat.com) will be under maintenance for infrastructure upgrades and will not be available on July 31st between 12:30 AM - 05:30 AM UTC. We appreciate your understanding and patience. You can follow status.redhat.com for details.
Bug 164389 - ant needs to obsolete ant-jmf
Summary: ant needs to obsolete ant-jmf
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: ant
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Deepak Bhole
QA Contact:
: 164786 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2005-07-27 16:11 UTC by Dennis Gilmore
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: 1.6.5-1jpp_9fc
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2006-06-07 19:38:24 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Dennis Gilmore 2005-07-27 16:11:15 UTC
Description of problem:
ant-apache-bsf needs to absolete ant-bsf

yum update of rawhide fails with Error: Missing Dependency: ant =
0:1.6.2-3jpp_10fc is needed by package ant-jmf

a look in rawhide shows no ant-bsf  anymore but an ant-apache-bsf  manuall
removal of ant-bsf  allows update to proced.  correct procedure is to put an
obsoletes  in the spec file  so update happen smoothly.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

Comment 1 Vadim Nasardinov 2005-08-01 20:50:01 UTC
Are you sure that you mean "ant-bsf" and not "ant-jmf"?

Your reported error message says:

 Missing Dependency: ant =0:1.6.2-3jpp_10fc is needed by package ant-jmf

The error message is correct.  The "jmf" subpackage of "ant" has been
recently removed.  This prevents the upgrade of ant.  That's a bug
which will be fixed.  I just want to figure out whether or not you've
run into something else entirely.

To help me figure this out, can you confirm that what you manually
removed was "ant-BSF" rather than "ant-JMF"?  There has never been an
"ant-bsf" package to my knowledge.

Comment 2 Vadim Nasardinov 2005-08-02 17:31:43 UTC
*** Bug 164786 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Vadim Nasardinov 2005-08-02 17:35:18 UTC
We never shipped "ant-bsf".

I'm changing the summary from

  ant-apache-bsf needs to obsolete ant-bsf

  ant needs to obsolete ant-jmf

See bug 164786 comment #2.

Comment 4 Dennis Gilmore 2005-08-03 00:32:22 UTC
Yes sorry i meant ant-jmf  i messed up when i after removing ant-jmf  yum  
installed ant-apache-bsf  

Comment 5 Deepak Bhole 2006-06-07 19:38:24 UTC
Has already been fixed in 1.6.5-1jpp_9fc.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.