Bug 1665246 (exiv2_027)

Summary:	exiv2 0.27 Tracker
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Germano Massullo (Thetra) <germano.massullo>
Component:	exiv2	Assignee:	Rex Dieter <rdieter>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	asn, dan.cermak, michel, rdieter
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature, Tracking
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2019-05-22 14:19:56 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1671082, 1671084, 1671085, 1671087, 1671088, 1671150, 1671151, 1671152, 1671153, 1671155, 1671156, 1671158, 1671159, 1674951, 1712982
Bug Blocks:

Description Germano Massullo (Thetra) 2019-01-10 19:11:49 UTC

Description of problem:
OpenSUSE exiv2 maintainer alerted me about the new 0.27 exiv2 version, and he also kindly sent me the list of patches that apply to 0.27 [1].
We should also check if our 0.26 patches [2] still apply to 0.27


[1]: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/graphics/exiv2
[2]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/exiv2/tree/master

Comment 1 Rex Dieter 2019-01-10 20:09:33 UTC

Maybe?

Upstream made a (IMO) big mess with 0.27, significantly changing api and abi.  I haven't had time to sort it all out (will likely reach out on -devel list looking for comaintainer help).

Comment 2 Rex Dieter 2019-01-10 20:28:34 UTC

That said, if suse already got it working, defintely can leverage that.  Thanks!

Comment 3 Rex Dieter 2019-01-10 21:05:30 UTC

I take back my comment about it being a mess.  the 0.27-RC1 release was a mess, but I hadn't seen anything since then.  Much better now :)  yay.

I'll work to get this into rawhide over the coming days, and announce and arrange for necessary package rebuilds.

Comment 4 Germano Massullo (Thetra) 2019-01-10 21:06:59 UTC

Perfect. If you need any help, just let me know

Comment 5 Rex Dieter 2019-01-10 21:12:06 UTC

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/exiv2/c/a124f15038c125ada9fde6c75955f1849f484d58?branch=master

Comment 6 Rex Dieter 2019-01-10 21:17:43 UTC

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/6SSGQHBHCZITBXGAVPSXL7TD22FTYJOS/

Comment 7 Andreas Schneider 2019-01-11 10:06:34 UTC

Rex, I can help with exiv2 if there is need to.

Comment 8 Rex Dieter 2019-01-30 16:25:36 UTC

Starting in today, initial build underway,
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32345809

Comment 9 Dan Čermák 2019-01-30 23:23:42 UTC

I have glanced over the source rpm and it looks you don't need 0035-cmake-ignore-warnings-about-missing-PDB-files-in-3rd.patch, that one should only fix stuff for Microsoft's C++ compiler.

Comment 10 Rex Dieter 2019-05-22 14:19:56 UTC

exiv2 0.27 landed in rawhide awhile back, little point in continuing to track the last couple FTBFS issues here (imo).  closing