Bug 1691039
Summary: | F29 to F31 KDE upgrades fail on ruby-irb / rubygem-irb conflict | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Adam Williamson <awilliam> |
Component: | ruby | Assignee: | Vít Ondruch <vondruch> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | ego.cordatus, mo, mtasaka, pvalena, robatino, ruby-packagers-sig, s, strzibny, vanmeeuwen+fedora, vondruch |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | openqa | ||
Fixed In Version: | ruby-2.6.2-118.fc31 ruby-2.6.2-118.fc30 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-03-29 19:19:38 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1644937 |
Description
Adam Williamson
2019-03-20 17:13:55 UTC
As it stands this should be an F31 Beta blocker, per criterion "For each one of the release-blocking package sets, it must be possible to successfully complete a direct upgrade from a fully updated, clean default installation of each of the last two stable Fedora releases with that package set installed." Oh, forget comment #2, I was getting my versions mixed up - it affects upgrades from both *28* and *29* to 31. 28 to 31 is not a supported case, so we only really have to worry about 29->31. This is directory -> symlink change refused by rpm transaction, ref: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/c/5aa32e278d096a36ba0d8926d4891f1e0757d4e5?branch=master ah, of course, good catch. ruby-2.6.2-118.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-95681e73f2 ruby-2.6.2-118.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-95681e73f2 Successfully upgraded from F29 to F30. My bugreport: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691950 Unfortunately, -118 creates file conflicts when updating in an existing F30 or Rawhide box. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691999 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692129 . -117 was in testing but it was revoked, upgrading from -116 (already in stable) to -118 (in testing) should be okay. *** Bug 1691950 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** (In reply to Andre Robatino from comment #9) > Unfortunately, -118 creates file conflicts when updating in an existing F30 > or Rawhide box. Sorry for troubles. This is the troubling directory -> symlink conversion :/ (In reply to Mamoru TASAKA from comment #10) > -117 was in testing but it was revoked, upgrading from -116 (already in > stable) to -118 (in testing) should be okay. I think that the upgrade issues from -117 to -118 has just limited impact, so I hope people can cope with the update. Downgrade to -116 and update to -118 is probably the best option. ruby-2.6.2-118.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |