Bug 169218

Summary:	Jonas post-script fails (rebuild-gcj-db not found)
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Ivan Gyurdiev <ivg231>
Component:	java-1.4.2-gcj-compat	Assignee:	Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	katzj, laroche
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-11-10 21:29:31 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	150222

Description Ivan Gyurdiev 2005-09-25 06:14:01 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8b3) Gecko/20050827 Fedora/1.1-0.2.8.deerpark.alpha2 Firefox/1.0+

Description of problem:
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.27634: line 24: /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db: No such file or directory
error: %post(jonas-4.3.3-1jpp_11fc.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 127

/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.94650: line 1: /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db: No such file or directory
error: %post(jonas-examples-4.3.3-1jpp_11fc.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 127



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
jonas-4.3.3-1jpp_11fc

How reproducible:
Didn't try

Steps to Reproduce:


Additional info:

Comment 2 Florian La Roche 2005-10-25 10:56:35 UTC

Is this with a fres install of the FC-development tree?

Comment 3 Florian La Roche 2005-10-25 10:58:14 UTC

fres -> fresh

Comment 5 Paul Nasrat 2005-10-25 20:42:54 UTC

Did you have any additional java packages installed - particularly those using
alternatives from JPackage.

If you have a different alternative selected /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db is not
there which is *not* an RPM bug.

Comment 6 Ivan Gyurdiev 2005-10-25 20:57:29 UTC

Yes, I use jpackage, with the Sun Javac.
I see rebuild-gcj-db appear when gcj is chosen.

However, I don't see how that's not a bug - sure looks like one to me. I see
scripts failing, duplicate packages being left in the rpm database, and
unnecessary confusion that the end user should not be subjected to.

Comment 7 Jeremy Katz 2005-10-26 16:10:10 UTC

If the scripts fail on removal, the package is left installed by design.

Comment 8 Paul Nasrat 2005-10-26 17:30:35 UTC

Gary - if people have switched to a non gcj java package the slave symlink will
not be present.  Perhaps the %post packages should use the full path to the
file, or the script should not be controlled by alternatives.

Comment 9 Thomas Fitzsimmons 2005-10-27 04:37:48 UTC

No, rebuild-gcj-db should never have been made an alternative.  We need to
create a separate java-gcj-compat-scripts package that java-1.4.2-gcj-compat
depends on and that depends on jpackage-utils.  In that package we should put
all these gcj-specific scripts.  If no one beats me to it, I'll do this next
week; there are many duplicates filed for this issue.

Comment 10 Thomas Fitzsimmons 2005-11-10 21:29:31 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 170433 ***