Bug 1710756
| Summary: | Cannot upgrade from Fedora 29 to 30 (ekiga and boost-signals) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Milan Crha <mcrha> |
| Component: | ekiga | Assignee: | Peter Robinson <pbrobinson> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 30 | CC: | dakingun, denis.arnaud_fedora, jwakely, pbrobinson, redhat-bugzilla, veillard |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2019-05-16 13:44:35 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 1674843 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Milan Crha
2019-05-16 09:15:20 UTC
(There had been reported two problems, the second is bug #1710759.) The ekiga package needs to be fixed or retired, this is not a boost problem. I'm already working on this, I've a working Ekiga build locally, but some crashes when calling or being called (which seem to be related to newer GCC optimizations, e.g. bug #1696458). Aha, my fault. I kind of expected that ekiga has its f30 build, been made as part of the mass rebuild, but I only now realized that its f30 build failed and does not exist: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1186090 I though that the boost forgot to add some obsolete or something like that for the removed package. Badly deciphered message on my side. Again, I'm sorry, my fault. I'm closing this bug to avoid duplicates. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1674843 *** I did forget to add the Obsoletes to boost (that was Bug 1706079) but it's not the problem here, and wouldn't have helped. > it's not the problem here, and wouldn't have helped.
Yes, I know, I understood as soon as you pointed to the right thing. I just misread the error message before and made some guesses, instead of being sure. I'm sorry.
|