Bug 1806875

Summary: Wrong sort criteria for capacity on console
Product: OpenShift Container Platform Reporter: shahan <hasha>
Component: Management ConsoleAssignee: Joe Caiani <jcaiani>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Yadan Pei <yapei>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 4.4CC: aos-bugs, jokerman, yapei
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 4.5.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Cause: pvc's were sorted by alpha Consequence: wrong sort order occurred Fix: sort numerically Result: provided correct sort order
 Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1807291 1807293 1807294 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-07-13 17:20:54 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1807293    

Description shahan 2020-02-25 09:01:04 UTC 
Description of problem:
Wrong sort criteria for capacity on console. sort criteria for pvc capacity should be numeric sort not the dictionary order

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.4.0-0.nightly-2020-02-24-105333

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. create several PVCs with 1Gi/10Gi/4GI size
2. The goto storage->pvc page and select all-project 
3. try to sort item by capacity

Actual results:
The items sorted based on dictionary order

Expected results:
sort criteria for pvc capacity should be numeric sort

Additional info:
Comment 4 shahan 2020-02-28 09:18:29 UTC 
sort criteria for pvc/pv capacity is numeric sort
4.5.0-0.ci-2020-02-28-043432
Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2020-07-13 17:20:54 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:2409