Bug 181875
| Summary: | Netatalk conflicts with bigloo | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ivan Gyurdiev <ivg231> |
| Component: | bigloo | Assignee: | Gérard Milmeister <gemi> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | jvdias |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2006-03-06 23:50:14 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
Well, as netatalk has been part of Core and RHEL for a very long time, and users may have come to depend on /usr/bin/afile in scripts etc., I'd say the onus is on bigloo not to create a conflict . I've CC'ed the bigloo maintainer, Gerard Milmeister, on this bug. Gerard, please could you move / rename /usr/bin/afile ? Perhaps to something like /usr/bin/blafile ? I have written to the author of bigloo to ask, what he thinks to to about it. In any case, it will be a little more complicated that just renaming, since the name occurs elsewhere too. |
Preparing... ########################################### [100%] file /usr/bin/afile from install of netatalk-2.0.3-4.2.1 conflicts with file from package bigloo-2.7a-2.fc5 file /usr/share/man/man1/afile.1.gz from install of netatalk-2.0.3-4.2.1 conflicts with file from package bigloo-2.7a-2.fc5