Bug 183164

Summary: Japanese Document Fonts are not always antialiased
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Robert Marcano <robert>
Component: openoffice.orgAssignee: Caolan McNamara <caolanm>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-02-27 09:50:34 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
different font sizes shown none

Description Robert Marcano 2006-02-27 03:23:28 UTC 
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060124 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Description of problem:
Japanese fonts are not always antialiases, Sometimes smaller fonts are antialised but bigger fonts are not. It does not respect the preference to antialias font bigger than 8pt.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
openoffice.org 2.0.1.1-5.1

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a document with japanese fonts
2. Set the zoom level to page width
2. resize the window horizontally from the smaller width to the entire screen

Actual Results:  each time the windows is resized, the japanese character will change from antialised to no antialise each time the font is scaled with the window.

Expected Results:  Fonts need to be antialiased always respecting the antialias oo.org preference

Additional info:
Comment 1 Robert Marcano 2006-02-27 03:25:17 UTC 
Created attachment 125301 [details]
different font sizes shown

Note that the second line is altialiased but the third is not, even that this
line has a bigger font.
Comment 2 Caolan McNamara 2006-02-27 09:50:34 UTC 
Sounds like embedded bitmap fontconfig honouring, i.e. 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 179692 ***