Bug 1832180
Summary: | [ovirt] trying to sync cloud-config fails MCO | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Roy Golan <rgolan> |
Component: | Machine Config Operator | Assignee: | Roy Golan <rgolan> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Jan Zmeskal <jzmeskal> |
Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | urgent | ||
Version: | 4.5 | CC: | amurdaca, jzmeskal, smilner |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 4.5.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-07-13 17:35:22 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Roy Golan
2020-05-06 09:37:15 UTC
This can be verified by verifying https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813741. Roy, if I remember correctly, this used to fail any OCP4.5 on RHV deployment, even without any customizations, is that right? If so, I believe any successful installation of OCP4.5 that contains this patch should verify it. (In reply to Jan Zmeskal from comment #5) > Roy, if I remember correctly, this used to fail any OCP4.5 on RHV > deployment, even without any customizations, is that right? If so, I believe > any successful installation of OCP4.5 that contains this patch should verify > it. correct. Verified with: openshift-install-linux-4.5.0-0.nightly-2020-05-18-043243 rhvm-4.3.10.3-0.1.master.el7.noarch Verification steps: Just deploy OCP on RHV cluster, this used to fail in a basic scenario. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:2409 |