Bug 18540
Summary: | gdm update requires gnome-libs update | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Brian Brock <bbrock> |
Component: | gdm | Assignee: | Elliot Lee <sopwith> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Aaron Brown <abrown> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 6.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2001-01-20 00:07:17 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Brian Brock
2000-10-06 15:29:24 UTC
Do you have a suggested fix? Do we need to put the 6.1 or 6.2 gnome-libs as an errata on the 6.0 errata page? I have no idea about how to do this so I'm assigning the bug to Elliot, who has more experience in this area. I'd recommend that we first either repost the old version of the gdm package (so that users following the errata don't recieve a 'file not found' error), or that we copy gnome-libs (and subsequent dependencies) into the 6.0 errata tree. I don't know for certain that we need the entire 6.1 errata into the 6.0 errata, I haven't tinkered enough in the packages yet. I don't know the entire fallout from following any of those paths, so I'll leave the decision up to everyone else. In a week or so, I'll be able to do more research and see which might be easier. |