Bug 1862133

Summary: [Independent Mode]Make MDS pool and filesystem detection optional in ceph-external-cluster-details-exporter.py script
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage Reporter: Sébastien Han <shan>
Component: rookAssignee: arun kumar mohan <amohan>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Sidhant Agrawal <sagrawal>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 4.5CC: amohan, assingh, badhikar, ebenahar, etamir, hnallurv, madam, muagarwa, nberry, ocs-bugs
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: AutomationBackLog
Target Release: OCS 4.5.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 4.5.0-64.ci Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1857304
: 1866155 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-09-15 10:18:25 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1857304, 1862449    
Bug Blocks: 1866155    

Comment 4 arun kumar mohan 2020-07-31 06:04:00 UTC
Raised a PR: https://github.com/rook/rook/pull/5931
Under review

Comment 5 arun kumar mohan 2020-08-04 08:42:19 UTC
PR merged and is backported it to rook 1.3.x branch.
Moving it to ON_QA.

Comment 6 Mudit Agarwal 2020-08-04 09:23:48 UTC
Yes, PR is merged but is this fix picked up by a downstream build yet? I guess no, so it should remain in MODIFIED state.
when a build that contains all the patches is given to QE, the BZ should be moved to ON_QA.

Comment 7 Neha Berry 2020-08-04 13:20:58 UTC
Do we need a clone in ocs-operator to bring the change in Operator UI as well ? similar to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862449 ?

Comment 8 Mudit Agarwal 2020-08-04 13:41:23 UTC
(In reply to Mudit Agarwal from comment #6)
> Yes, PR is merged but is this fix picked up by a downstream build yet? I
> guess no, so it should remain in MODIFIED state.
> when a build that contains all the patches is given to QE, the BZ should be
> moved to ON_QA.

Fixed in today's build

(In reply to Neha Berry from comment #7)
> Do we need a clone in ocs-operator to bring the change in Operator UI as
> well ? similar to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862449 ?

I think yes, if possible we should find an owner too in advance :)

Comment 9 Sébastien Han 2020-08-04 13:53:22 UTC
I believe Bipul is the right person to quickly fix this.
Bipul, could you please take care of this?

Just close that BZ :) 

Thanks.

Comment 10 Neha Berry 2020-08-04 18:53:17 UTC
(In reply to leseb from comment #9)
> I believe Bipul is the right person to quickly fix this.
> Bipul, could you please take care of this?
> 
> Just close that BZ :) 
> 

you mean clone ?

 @bipul let us know once corresponding bug in ocs-operator is raised. so that we can ack it.

thanks

> Thanks.

Comment 11 Mudit Agarwal 2020-08-05 02:40:39 UTC
(In reply to Neha Berry from comment #10)
> (In reply to leseb from comment #9)
> > I believe Bipul is the right person to quickly fix this.
> > Bipul, could you please take care of this?
> > 
> > Just close that BZ :) 
> > 
> 
> you mean clone ?

He meant closed only ;-)

> 
>  @bipul let us know once corresponding bug in ocs-operator is raised. so
> that we can ack it.

I have cloned it (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1866155) and assigned it to Bipul.

Comment 14 arun kumar mohan 2020-08-12 07:13:39 UTC
Submitted a PR: https://github.com/rook/rook/pull/6048, for the first issue pointed by @Sidhant.

Comment 18 errata-xmlrpc 2020-09-15 10:18:25 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage 4.5.0 bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:3754