Bug 1862133 - [Independent Mode]Make MDS pool and filesystem detection optional in ceph-external-cluster-details-exporter.py script
Summary: [Independent Mode]Make MDS pool and filesystem detection optional in ceph-ext...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: rook
Version: 4.5
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: OCS 4.5.0
Assignee: arun kumar mohan
QA Contact: Sidhant Agrawal
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1857304 1862449
Blocks: 1866155
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-07-30 14:19 UTC by Sébastien Han
Modified: 2020-09-23 09:03 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 4.5.0-64.ci
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1857304
: 1866155 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-09-15 10:18:25 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github openshift rook pull 105 0 None closed Bug 1862133: Making RBD provisioner, Ceph provisioner and Ceph node optional 2021-02-01 09:18:26 UTC
Github openshift rook pull 95 0 None closed Bug 1862133: ceph: bunch of fixes for create-external-cluster-resources.py 2021-02-01 09:18:26 UTC
Github rook rook pull 5931 0 None closed ceph: Allowing ceph filesystem argument to be optional 2021-02-01 09:18:26 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2020:3754 0 None None None 2020-09-15 10:18:59 UTC

Comment 4 arun kumar mohan 2020-07-31 06:04:00 UTC 
Raised a PR: https://github.com/rook/rook/pull/5931
Under review
Comment 5 arun kumar mohan 2020-08-04 08:42:19 UTC 
PR merged and is backported it to rook 1.3.x branch.
Moving it to ON_QA.
Comment 6 Mudit Agarwal 2020-08-04 09:23:48 UTC 
Yes, PR is merged but is this fix picked up by a downstream build yet? I guess no, so it should remain in MODIFIED state.
when a build that contains all the patches is given to QE, the BZ should be moved to ON_QA.
Comment 7 Neha Berry 2020-08-04 13:20:58 UTC 
Do we need a clone in ocs-operator to bring the change in Operator UI as well ? similar to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862449 ?
Comment 8 Mudit Agarwal 2020-08-04 13:41:23 UTC 
(In reply to Mudit Agarwal from comment #6)
> Yes, PR is merged but is this fix picked up by a downstream build yet? I
> guess no, so it should remain in MODIFIED state.
> when a build that contains all the patches is given to QE, the BZ should be
> moved to ON_QA.

Fixed in today's build

(In reply to Neha Berry from comment #7)
> Do we need a clone in ocs-operator to bring the change in Operator UI as
> well ? similar to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862449 ?

I think yes, if possible we should find an owner too in advance :)
Comment 9 Sébastien Han 2020-08-04 13:53:22 UTC 
I believe Bipul is the right person to quickly fix this.
Bipul, could you please take care of this?

Just close that BZ :) 

Thanks.
Comment 10 Neha Berry 2020-08-04 18:53:17 UTC 
(In reply to leseb from comment #9)
> I believe Bipul is the right person to quickly fix this.
> Bipul, could you please take care of this?
> 
> Just close that BZ :) 
> 

you mean clone ?

 @bipul let us know once corresponding bug in ocs-operator is raised. so that we can ack it.

thanks

> Thanks.
Comment 11 Mudit Agarwal 2020-08-05 02:40:39 UTC 
(In reply to Neha Berry from comment #10)
> (In reply to leseb from comment #9)
> > I believe Bipul is the right person to quickly fix this.
> > Bipul, could you please take care of this?
> > 
> > Just close that BZ :) 
> > 
> 
> you mean clone ?

He meant closed only ;-)

> 
>  @bipul let us know once corresponding bug in ocs-operator is raised. so
> that we can ack it.

I have cloned it (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1866155) and assigned it to Bipul.
Comment 14 arun kumar mohan 2020-08-12 07:13:39 UTC 
Submitted a PR: https://github.com/rook/rook/pull/6048, for the first issue pointed by @Sidhant.
Comment 18 errata-xmlrpc 2020-09-15 10:18:25 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage 4.5.0 bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:3754
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.