Bug 1862449 - [Independent Mode]Remove validation for RGW Endpoint in UI creation of external Storagecluster (linked to Bug 1857304)
Summary: [Independent Mode]Remove validation for RGW Endpoint in UI creation of extern...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: ocs-operator
Version: 4.5
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: OCS 4.5.0
Assignee: arun kumar mohan
QA Contact: Sidhant Agrawal
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1857304
Blocks: 1862133 1866155
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-07-31 13:14 UTC by Bipul Adhikari
Modified: 2020-09-23 09:04 UTC (History)
14 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 4.5.0-64.ci
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1857304
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-09-15 10:18:25 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github openshift ocs-operator pull 661 0 None closed Remove RGW storage class as required from the UI validation 2020-12-02 19:36:42 UTC
Github openshift ocs-operator pull 669 0 None closed Bug 1862449: Remove validation for RGW Endpoint during creation of External Storge cluster in OCS UI 2020-12-02 19:36:43 UTC
Github openshift ocs-operator pull 719 0 None closed Bug 1862449: [release-4.5] Create only those StorageClasses which are provided in the external input file 2020-12-02 19:37:09 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2020:3754 0 None None None 2020-09-15 10:18:59 UTC

Comment 2 Bipul Adhikari 2020-07-31 13:16:06 UTC 
Making a clone to send fixes on the ocs-operator side.
Comment 3 Mudit Agarwal 2020-07-31 13:39:07 UTC 
Target release should be 4.5, if I am not wrong. Also, we need devel acks if we are taking it for OCS4.5 (please note that 4.5 is in blocker only mode as of now)
Comment 4 Bipul Adhikari 2020-08-03 08:56:11 UTC 
If I am not mistaken we need to first fix in the master which is tracking 4.6 and then backport it to 4.5. Thus this BZ is pointing to 4.6.
Comment 5 Mudit Agarwal 2020-08-03 09:38:07 UTC 
Yes, first it needs to be fixed in master only but we don't need a BZ for 4.6 as of now because it is in dev phase.
Moreover, ack flags are set to ocs-4.5 ? because of which it is shown in 4.5 BZ list and not 4.6
Comment 7 Jose A. Rivera 2020-08-03 16:38:17 UTC 
This BZ has not been marked as a blocker, and it looks like the related changes in Rook have resolved the actual blocker issue. As such, moving this to OCS 4.6. Also moving it to NEW, since I'm not aware of anyone working on this yet. If so, please assign it to yourself.
Comment 10 Jose A. Rivera 2020-08-03 19:13:47 UTC 
Backport PR merged.
Comment 12 Mudit Agarwal 2020-08-11 03:08:06 UTC 
Bipul, please take a look.
Comment 13 Sébastien Han 2020-08-11 08:30:22 UTC 
Sidhant , can you describe the following SC ocs-external-storagecluster-ceph-rgw?
Thanks
Comment 14 Sébastien Han 2020-08-11 09:15:45 UTC 
AFAIK, even if rgw is not available we fallback to nooba handling OBC requests so I'd say the SC is expected, however its configuration might be incorrect.
Nimrod, am I right?

Thanks.
Comment 15 Nimrod Becker 2020-08-11 09:27:45 UTC 
There is no automatic failback, since the OBC is created with a certain SC and that would be the provisioned handling it.
If an OBC is created on RGW and RGW is not avail it will not be handled by NooBaa ... Same as for PVs
Comment 17 Bipul Adhikari 2020-08-12 08:07:06 UTC 
Resetting to default assignee as this isn't an UI related issue.
Comment 18 arun kumar mohan 2020-08-12 19:50:20 UTC 
Raised PR: https://github.com/openshift/ocs-operator/pull/701
@Sebastian, @Jose, please take a look...
Comment 19 Jose A. Rivera 2020-08-21 21:23:06 UTC 
PR 701 has merged. Created backport PR: https://github.com/openshift/ocs-operator/pull/719
Comment 23 errata-xmlrpc 2020-09-15 10:18:25 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage 4.5.0 bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:3754
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.