Bug 1862449

Summary: [Independent Mode]Remove validation for RGW Endpoint in UI creation of external Storagecluster (linked to Bug 1857304)
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage Reporter: Bipul Adhikari <badhikar>
Component: ocs-operatorAssignee: arun kumar mohan <amohan>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Sidhant Agrawal <sagrawal>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 4.5CC: assingh, badhikar, ebenahar, etamir, jarrpa, madam, muagarwa, nbecker, nberry, ocs-bugs, sagrawal, shan, sostapov, uchapaga
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: AutomationBackLog
Target Release: OCS 4.5.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 4.5.0-64.ci Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1857304 Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-09-15 10:18:25 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1857304    
Bug Blocks: 1862133, 1866155    

Comment 2 Bipul Adhikari 2020-07-31 13:16:06 UTC
Making a clone to send fixes on the ocs-operator side.

Comment 3 Mudit Agarwal 2020-07-31 13:39:07 UTC
Target release should be 4.5, if I am not wrong. Also, we need devel acks if we are taking it for OCS4.5 (please note that 4.5 is in blocker only mode as of now)

Comment 4 Bipul Adhikari 2020-08-03 08:56:11 UTC
If I am not mistaken we need to first fix in the master which is tracking 4.6 and then backport it to 4.5. Thus this BZ is pointing to 4.6.

Comment 5 Mudit Agarwal 2020-08-03 09:38:07 UTC
Yes, first it needs to be fixed in master only but we don't need a BZ for 4.6 as of now because it is in dev phase.
Moreover, ack flags are set to ocs-4.5 ? because of which it is shown in 4.5 BZ list and not 4.6

Comment 7 Jose A. Rivera 2020-08-03 16:38:17 UTC
This BZ has not been marked as a blocker, and it looks like the related changes in Rook have resolved the actual blocker issue. As such, moving this to OCS 4.6. Also moving it to NEW, since I'm not aware of anyone working on this yet. If so, please assign it to yourself.

Comment 10 Jose A. Rivera 2020-08-03 19:13:47 UTC
Backport PR merged.

Comment 12 Mudit Agarwal 2020-08-11 03:08:06 UTC
Bipul, please take a look.

Comment 13 Sébastien Han 2020-08-11 08:30:22 UTC
Sidhant , can you describe the following SC ocs-external-storagecluster-ceph-rgw?
Thanks

Comment 14 Sébastien Han 2020-08-11 09:15:45 UTC
AFAIK, even if rgw is not available we fallback to nooba handling OBC requests so I'd say the SC is expected, however its configuration might be incorrect.
Nimrod, am I right?

Thanks.

Comment 15 Nimrod Becker 2020-08-11 09:27:45 UTC
There is no automatic failback, since the OBC is created with a certain SC and that would be the provisioned handling it.
If an OBC is created on RGW and RGW is not avail it will not be handled by NooBaa ... Same as for PVs

Comment 17 Bipul Adhikari 2020-08-12 08:07:06 UTC
Resetting to default assignee as this isn't an UI related issue.

Comment 18 arun kumar mohan 2020-08-12 19:50:20 UTC
Raised PR: https://github.com/openshift/ocs-operator/pull/701
@Sebastian, @Jose, please take a look...

Comment 19 Jose A. Rivera 2020-08-21 21:23:06 UTC
PR 701 has merged. Created backport PR: https://github.com/openshift/ocs-operator/pull/719

Comment 23 errata-xmlrpc 2020-09-15 10:18:25 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage 4.5.0 bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:3754