Bug 1866347

Summary:	Wrong format for monitoring keepalived
Product:	OpenShift Container Platform	Reporter:	Yuval Goldberg <ygoldber>
Component:	Installer	Assignee:	Yuval Goldberg <ygoldber>
Installer sub component:	OpenShift on Bare Metal IPI	QA Contact:	Constantin Vultur <cvultur>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	Docs Contact:
Severity:	medium
Priority:	urgent	CC:	afasano, alazar, bperkins, cvultur, rfreiman, shardy
Version:	4.6	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	4.6.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:	OCP-Metal-External-Blocker
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-10-27 16:24:53 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Yuval Goldberg 2020-08-05 11:55:04 UTC

Description of problem:

Deploying multiple assisted installers where the user does not provide the VIP addresses with the same cluster name ends up with them competing for the same DHCP leased address and conflicting.

Version:
baremetal-runtimecfg 4.6

Steps to reproduce:
1. Deploy an assisted installer cluster without providing VIPs specifying clustername='reproducer'
2. Deploy another cluster on the same DHCP served network without providing VIP addresses and specifying the same clustername, i.e., 'reproducer'

Actual results:
Both the first and the second cluster ask DHCP for a lease with the same MAC address, thus the first cluster breaks as the address is taken by the second and the second fails to deploy.

Expected results:
Each cluster requests different addresses to DHCP so we keep allowing multiple clusters named the same

Comment 1 Andrea Fasano 2020-08-11 16:06:40 UTC

Yuval could you please provide more details about the problem? The description is not very clear. Thanks

Comment 4 Ronnie Lazar 2020-08-26 12:02:06 UTC

*** Bug 1866348 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2020-10-27 16:24:53 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (OpenShift Container Platform 4.6 GA Images), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:4196