Bug 1896608
Summary: | nothing provides python3.9dist(secretstorage) >= 3.2 needed by python3-keyring-21.5.0-1.fc33.noarch | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Matt Fagnani <matt.fagnani> |
Component: | python-keyring | Assignee: | Christopher Tubbs <ctubbsii> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 33 | CC: | apevec, bperkins, ctubbsii, i, igor.raits, redhat-bugzilla, rtnpro |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-11-27 05:25:31 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Matt Fagnani
2020-11-11 03:20:27 UTC
Fixing this might be possible in F33 by updating secretstorage to 3.2.0, but I'd like the same SPEC to build for epel8, F32, F33, and rawhide. It seems the secretstorage requirement is too aggressive, and seems to be generated by the automatic python dependencies stuff. This version does not *actually* require a version that new... nothing has changed to require the newer version. I'm not sure if it would be better to patch the upstream to be less aggressive in its requirements, or to wait for all of the supported releasevers to update to the newer version of secretstorage. Oh no! I'm wrong... it *does* require 3.2 or later. It uses `secretstorage.check_service_availability`, which is new in 3.2. So, that will have to be added first, for all supported releasevers (epel8, F32, F33, rawhide), or else I'll have to revert this change across all those branches. This was worked through and fixed in the update for bug 1873845; closing as a duplicate of that one *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1873845 *** |