Bug 189935

Summary:	Missing BuildRequires in spec file.
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Rob Andrews <rob>
Component:	rhythmbox	Assignee:	Monty <cmontgom>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	kem
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-06-15 00:55:56 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Rob Andrews 2006-04-25 21:26:26 UTC

Description of problem:
rhythmbox is missing some BuildRequires in the spec file. I was investigating
why audioscrobbler support hadn't been built in (it defaults to enabled in
configure unless its dependancies aren't installed), but came across a few
problems when building.

Firstly, it is missing a BuildRequires on gstreamer-devel. When it came to
building, and I found I hadn't installed gstreamer-devel, the build failed. As
you well know, rpmbuild usually grunts if you are missing a BuildRequire :)

Secondly, it is missing a build dependancy on libtool. The build fails quite
late in because of this.

Thirdly, the executable links against libsoup but the build fails unless
libsoup-devel is installed. As a result, I suspect this may be a BuildRequire also. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rhythmbox-0.9.4-2

How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -e gstreamer-devel libtool libsoup-devel
2. rpmbuild --rebuild rhythmbox-0.9.4-2.src.rpm
3. See it fail until you install at least gstreamer-devel, libtool and
libsoup-devel.

I am sorry for such a pedantic bug report!

Comment 1 Rob Andrews 2006-04-25 21:27:30 UTC

Ooops, audioscrobbler support *had* been built in, the location had changed
since rhythmbox 0.9.3, but the BuildRequires are still outstanding.

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2006-06-15 00:55:56 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 191760 ***