Bug 192676

Summary: multilib -devel conflicts for gmp
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jeremy Katz <katzj>
Component: gmpAssignee: Thomas Woerner <twoerner>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: laurent.rineau__fedora, notting
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 4.1.4-9 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-12-01 15:46:29 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 192658    

Description Jeremy Katz 2006-05-22 17:54:31 UTC
The package contains conflicting -devel packages for multilib arches.

gmp-devel-4.1.4-6.2.1.i386.rpm
warning: gmp-devel-4.1.4-6.2.1.i386.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID
4f2a6fd2
Preparing...                ##################################################
        file /usr/include/gmp-mparam.h from install of gmp-devel-4.1.4-6.2.1 con
flicts with file from package gmp-devel-4.1.4-6.2.1
        file /usr/include/gmp.h from install of gmp-devel-4.1.4-6.2.1 conflicts
with file from package gmp-devel-4.1.4-6.2.1

Comment 1 Laurent Rineau 2006-07-20 09:52:07 UTC
IMO, this is not a bug: you cannot expect to install -devel sub-packages from 
different arch repositories.

If you want to be able to compile i386 applications on your machine, you'll 
have to setup a chrooted installation of a pure i386 Fedora.

Please re-open the bug if it happens that i have missed something.


Comment 2 Jeremy Katz 2006-07-20 13:11:20 UTC
You're missing the point entirely.  We have shipped an x86 runtime on x86_64 for
a while, we're now expanding that to include development support for FC6.  Thus,
this needs to be fixed (you'll note that gmp-devel.i386 is included in the
x86_64 tree now)

Comment 3 Laurent Rineau 2006-07-20 13:46:23 UTC
Ok. That bug is then a bug common to a lot of -devel packages, IMO.


Comment 4 Jeremy Katz 2006-10-02 21:51:16 UTC
*** Bug 205209 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Laurent Rineau 2006-12-01 14:46:31 UTC
(I am doing bug triage about gmp.)

As far as I know, this bug is know fixed, since gmp-4.1.4-9. Can anybody using 
a multiarch platform confirm?


Comment 6 Jeremy Katz 2006-12-01 15:46:29 UTC
Looks fixed to me; thanks for the triaging!