Bug 1933644
| Summary: | Don't BuildRequires xorg-x11-font-utils | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer> |
| Component: | unifont | Assignee: | Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | andreas.bierfert, extras-qa, fonts-bugs, i18n-bugs, jani, petersen, psatpute, pwu, tagoh, vishalvijayraghavan, zbyszek |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | unifont-13.0.05-2.fc34 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-03-01 12:46:22 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1932731 | ||
|
Description
Peter Hutterer
2021-03-01 10:42:23 UTC
I'll apply this. But I think it'd make more sense to submit pull requests for other packages. I rebuild this, but actually it doesn't make sense to even create an update, since there's no change in the binary package. (I checked the provides in F33 and F32, and we could do the same change there without any harm, but I don't see the need.) > I'll apply this. But I think it'd make more sense to submit pull requests for other packages. thanks to running out of disk space, the initial list of packages was much smaller than the final list... creating the bugs seemed like the more prudent (and trackable) solution. Don't think I'll do that again now that I have all spec files locally :) thanks for the push, much appreciated. > I rebuild this, but actually it doesn't make sense to even create an update, since there's no change in the binary package. dnf would still fetch the old one with the wrong BR, so I think a new build would be a good idea here. Otherwise there's the slim chance of a srpm rebuild failing when we move bdftopcf out of -utils. FEDORA-2021-929a0acb1c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-929a0acb1c FEDORA-2021-929a0acb1c has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-929a0acb1c` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-929a0acb1c See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2021-929a0acb1c has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2021-929a0acb1c has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |