Bug 19446
Summary: | Anaconda crashes using update image | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Patrick Coffey <pat> | ||||
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Michael Fulbright <msf> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Brock Organ <borgan> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 7.0 | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | i386 | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2000-11-07 15:54:20 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Patrick Coffey
2000-10-20 05:47:30 UTC
Created attachment 4448 [details]
Core dump file saved by installation program
What is on partition /dev/hdc1, and how was it created? It seems like it is marked as a RAID partition but it does not contain an actual RAID partition. Is this an upgrade or install? * partition /dev/hdc1 is FAT32 and contains a bunch of old windows98 files. * I was doing an upgrade from RedHat 6.2. Originally when I installed 6.2, I told it to make /dev/hdc1 a RAID disk (Yes, I didn't know what I was doing). Despite my naivete, 6.2 still installed okay, still read the files from hdc1 after the install was complete, and just gave me a quick warning message during bootup that reminded me that hdc1 is not a valid RAID partition. does your system still consider this a RAID partition (ie entries in /etc/raidtab, etc.) ...? Are you able to remove the references to hdc1 as a RAID-able partition ...? Having a FAT filesystem seen as a RAID-able partition is an irregular case, and could lead to unpredictable (and undesirable!) results in the future ... :( |