Bug 2008717
Summary: | JQ Mess Up with Big Integer | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | Yanping Li <lyp> |
Component: | jq | Assignee: | Tomas Halman <thalman> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Scott Poore <spoore> |
Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 8.0 | CC: | davide, spoore, thalman |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Triaged |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | jq-1.6-3.el8 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2022-05-10 13:38:07 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Deadline: | 2021-11-09 |
Description
Yanping Li
2021-09-29 01:17:13 UTC
Looks like this impacts Fedora as well, I can repro it on Fedora 34, 35 and on Rawhide. Filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008979 to track it there. And this also repros on CentOS Stream 9 so filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008983 for that We have backported the Fedora fix for this (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jq/pull-request/4) in https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=35237 for Hyperscale, you can see the branch here in case it helps: https://git.centos.org/rpms/jq/c/f116ff5a7250bc9a9a6d42b7670aff28a99755c8?branch=c8s-sig-hyperscale Verified Version :: jq-1.6-3.el8.x86_64 Results :: [root@rhel8 ~]# echo '{"a":9011153322235679}' | jq '.a' 9011153322235679 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (jq bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:1788 |