Bug 2027396
| Summary: | [4.9.z clone] [Data Loss] Use ceph 'osd safe-to-destroy' and 'osd ok-to-stop' feature in OSD purge job | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation | Reporter: | Sébastien Han <shan> |
| Component: | rook | Assignee: | Travis Nielsen <tnielsen> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Rachael <rgeorge> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 4.9 | CC: | bkunal, ebenahar, karthickdoss, kbg, kramdoss, madam, muagarwa, nberry, ocs-bugs, odf-bz-bot, owasserm, rcyriac, rgeorge, shan, sheggodu, tnielsen, vumrao |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Reopened |
| Target Release: | ODF 4.9.11 | Flags: | kramdoss:
needinfo+
|
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: |
With this enhancement, OSDs cannot be purged unless all the data (PGs) from the OSD is already recovered to other OSDs or the --force flag is passed to the OSD removal job. This avoids the risk of data loss particularly if multiple OSDs are removed at the same time.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | 2026007 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2022-09-26 16:46:45 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 2026007 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 2027826, 2054518, 2119510, 2120260 | ||
|
Comment 5
Travis Nielsen
2022-02-14 16:37:46 UTC
Reopening per discussion to backport all the way to 4.6.z Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.9.11 bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:6718 |