Bug 203482

Summary: refreshing the desktop
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: jim <fedorajim>
Component: nautilusAssignee: Alexander Larsson <alexl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6CC: jko, splinux25, treilly
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-09-25 08:42:14 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Description jim 2006-08-21 23:07:30 UTC
Description of problem:
Always have to hit CNTL R  to refresh the desktop to see new items there. Also
need to do this in ANY directory i'm in 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gnome 2.15   fc6 test2

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
Actual results:

Expected results:
when a folder is placed onthe desktop  the folder appear  
when a file is downloaded to the desktop or some other folder it appears in the
file browser 

Additional info:

Comment 1 Damien Durand 2006-08-26 11:48:48 UTC
Thank you for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported
into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further
bugs you find.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 203854 ***

Comment 2 Jong Bae KO 2006-08-28 00:01:36 UTC
*** Bug 203854 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 jim 2006-08-28 21:12:45 UTC
if 203854 is a duplicate of this report then this bug should be open.

Comment 4 Tim Reilly 2006-09-20 22:51:53 UTC
I'm running in to this problem with pretty current (fc6test3) packages. Dragging
files between local folders refreshes the desktop properly but creating new
files and dragging files from NFS-mounted folders does not work.

Comment 5 Alexander Larsson 2006-09-25 08:42:14 UTC
Why is this bug open when it was marked as a duplicate?
They are both basically the same issue, no need to track it twice.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 203854 ***

Comment 6 Tim Reilly 2006-09-25 16:59:44 UTC
I think it was open because the bugs were simultaneously marked duplicates of
each other.