Bug 2036747
| Summary: | Please branch and build python-responses in epel9 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Alessio <alciregi> |
| Component: | python-responses | Assignee: | Felix Schwarz <fschwarz> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | epel9 | CC: | athoscribeiro, fschwarz, michel, orion, praiskup |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | python-responses-0.18.0-1.el9 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-02-11 00:26:04 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 2035376, 2045985 | ||
|
Description
Alessio
2022-01-03 19:53:14 UTC
Let's see if we can get RedHat to ship it - see bug #2040998 (In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #1) > Let's see if we can get RedHat to ship it - see bug #2040998 per Miro, it's actually retired. It bit me a few times already, the package is in gitlab but once you browse, there's a dead.package. Athos or @ Athos or @fschwarz - could you help branch and build this? (accidentally submitted before finishing my comment, sorry) The EPEL Packaging SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish to build it on epel9 (please add the epel-packagers-sig group as collaborator on epel* branches) Additionally, I would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish to build it for epel9 (FAS salimma). *** Bug 2045987 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Michel: sorry, did not see your comment earlier and I did not realize I became an admin some time ago so I thought this was just part of the python-sig stack. I'll go through the issues this evening and get everything updated/branched. However I always like additional co-maintainers. EPEL sig+salimma FTW. What is the EPEL sig user name to use in pagure? quick question: How can I run a mockbuild for EPEL 9 manually? $ mock --rebuild -r /etc/mock/epel-next-9-x86_64.cfg python-responses-0.17.0-1.fc36.src.rpm ... No match for argument: fedpkg-minimal Error: Unable to find a match: fedpkg-minimal Any way to trigger a local build? By `mock -r centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64 ...`. @Pavel: Thanks, that worked for me (after installing the mock packages from updates-testing) epel9 branch requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/41352 @Michel: I made you a co-admin for python-responses. I can do the initial EPEL 9 build but I'm absolutely happy if someone else also has an eye on python-responses. Feel free to add also the EPEL-sig. FEDORA-EPEL-2022-051178a1ea has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-051178a1ea FEDORA-EPEL-2022-051178a1ea has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-051178a1ea See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2022-051178a1ea has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-051178a1ea See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2022-051178a1ea has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |