Bug 204455
Summary: | Addition of servers not possible per up2date / rhn_register | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 | Reporter: | Tom Stocker <thomas.stocker> |
Component: | up2date | Assignee: | Bryan Kearney <bkearney> |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Brandon Perkins <bperkins> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4.0 | CC: | jgaertne, rhn-bugs |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-05-08 13:17:13 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Tom Stocker
2006-08-29 09:49:33 UTC
*** Bug 204456 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Do you have a universal activation key set for your organization? Yes, there are two activation keys in their account. One inclusding the "universal default" one without. How did they get them? Ah, I think now I got it. First there was a 30-day-eval entitlement including management on the account. Therefor they got this universal activation key. Then they purchased an es entitlementwithout management module but the former key still existed. Can this be the happened szenario? No. First there was an "official" activation key, the 30day trial was added later. In fact the problem was solved bye removing the "universal default" key. Got this tip from RedHat Sales. Thanks for reply, case closed. User bnackash's account has been closed |