Bug 206576

Summary: corrupted symlink in dbus-devel
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka>
Component: dbusAssignee: John (J5) Palmieri <johnp>
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5CC: jkeck
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-09-15 16:44:09 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 205136    

Description Mamoru TASAKA 2006-09-15 03:38:19 UTC
Description of problem:
/usr/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so points to  libdbus-glib-1.so.2.0.0,
which does not exist.
See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
dbus-devel-0.61-3.fc5.1

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
/lib/libdbus-1.so.2.0.0 exists in dbus-0.61-3.fc5.1

Comment 1 Mamoru TASAKA 2006-09-15 03:57:25 UTC
This is because dbus-devel does not require dbus-glib.

Well, perhaps dbus-glib-devel should be created and
all files in dbus-devel related to dbus-glib should be moved to
dbus-glib-devel. Then dbus-glib-devel should require dbus-devel,
dbus-glib.

Comment 2 John (J5) Palmieri 2006-09-15 16:42:38 UTC
Will add a requires for dbus-devel.  There is no point in adding the new
subpackage now.  Note that this is fixed in rawhide because of the core/bidnings
split.

Comment 3 John (J5) Palmieri 2006-09-15 16:44:09 UTC
Actually scratch that.  There is no reason to have user upgrading d-bus for a
devel fix.  I will fix the issue in CVS but only build if there are important
updates.

Comment 4 John (J5) Palmieri 2006-09-15 16:46:24 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 206573 ***

Comment 5 John (J5) Palmieri 2006-09-15 16:47:40 UTC
My fault not a duplicate