Bug 206741

Summary: FC6test3 doesn't install if hdd has reiser partitions
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: German Monroy <german.monroy>
Component: kernelAssignee: Dave Jones <davej>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6CC: pfrields, sardaukar.siet, wtogami
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-09-17 05:34:31 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description German Monroy 2006-09-16 01:22:23 UTC 
Description of problem:
Installation aborted before it gave a chance to edit the partition table.  The
last lines on /tmp/anaconda.log were:
 Isys.py:mount()- going to mount /tmp/sda2 on /mnt/sysimage
 Isys.py:mount()- going to mount /tmp/sda5 on /mnt/sysimage
 Isys.py:mount()- going to mount /tmp/sda6 on /mnt/sysimage
in my system sda2 and sda5 were RH4u4 partitions and sda6 was a SLED10 partition.
Ctrl-Alt-F1 after the error displayed:
 install exit abnormally [1/1]
Ctrl-Alt-F2 after the error displayed an error stack trace.  Since I couldn't
scroll back I don't know the context but the last three function calls were:
 syscall_call -> sys_oldumount -> sys_umount

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
FC6Test3 CDs

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.  install SLED10 (reiser fs is the default) in one partition
2.  Install FC6Test3
3.
  
Actual results:
installation fails

Expected results:
installation should continue

Additional info:
same CDs worked ok in a hdd that only had one partition with RHEL5 Beta
Comment 1 Chris Lumens 2006-09-16 21:14:09 UTC 
*** Bug 206743 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Chris Lumens 2006-09-16 21:15:12 UTC 
*** Bug 206742 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Chris Lumens 2006-09-16 21:16:56 UTC 
*** Bug 206740 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Dave Jones 2006-09-17 05:34:31 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 206036 ***