Bug 208072

Summary: Review Request: brasero - Gnome CD/DVD burning application
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Denis Leroy <denis>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Kevin Fenzi <kevin>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: kevin
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-10-04 10:22:54 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 163779    

Description Denis Leroy 2006-09-26 09:21:24 UTC
(project formerly known as "bonfire")

Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/brasero.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/brasero-0.4.4-1.src.rpm

Description:
Simple and easy to use CD/DVD burning application for the Gnome
desktop.

Comment 1 Brian Pepple 2006-09-26 13:23:32 UTC
Here's a quick items:

1. Why are you redefining %version?
2. Duplicate BuildRequires: glib2-devel (by gtk2-devel), libxml2-devel (by
libgnome-devel), gnome-vfs2-devel (by libgnome-devel), gtk2-devel (by
libgnomeui-devel), libgnome-devel (by libgnomeui-devel)

Comment 2 Denis Leroy 2006-09-26 14:10:21 UTC
1. *bonk*. fixed
2. fixed.

Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/brasero.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/brasero-0.4.4-2.src.rpm


Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2006-10-03 01:30:14 UTC
Humm. I can't make much from the URL and Source0 links here. 
Do they need to be updated? 

The URL points to a graphic design web site with lots of flash and javascript, 
but no mention of open source software I can see. The Source0 url on 
sourceforge doesn't seem to point to any files... ;( 


Comment 4 Denis Leroy 2006-10-03 09:14:26 UTC
Homepage changes yes thx. Fixed.

http://www.poolshark.org/src/brasero.spec
http://www.poolshark.org/src/brasero-0.4.4-3.src.rpm


Comment 5 Kevin Fenzi 2006-10-03 17:09:55 UTC
ok. That looks much better. ;) 

Look for a full review later today... 

Comment 6 Kevin Fenzi 2006-10-03 17:25:43 UTC
OK - Package name
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (GPL)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
1ef6ae66677ed9136634692d8bc1cc7a  brasero-0.4.4.tar.bz2
1ef6ae66677ed9136634692d8bc1cc7a  brasero-0.4.4.tar.bz2.1
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - No rpmlint output.

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it.
OK - Should build in mock.

Issues:

1. 0.4.91 seems to be out but it looks like thats a unstable
testing version (hard to be sure).

No other blockers I can see... this package is APPROVED.

Please remember to close this package NEXTRELEASE once it's  
been imported and built.

Consider reviewing another waiting package to help spread
the reviewing load. :)


Comment 7 Denis Leroy 2006-10-04 10:22:54 UTC
I'll test the unstable release and consider them for upgrades. I'm actually
working on this upstream project at the moment.

Built. Thanks for the review!