Bug 209339
Summary: | Missing support for EAP-FAST | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Russell Harrison <fedora> |
Component: | NetworkManager | Assignee: | Dan Williams <dcbw> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 6.0 | CC: | cmarcant, daly, danw, james.brown, jason.redhat.20030417, jklimes, jrb, mvadkert, notting, riek, rprice, tao, tpelka |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Reopened, Triaged |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-06-20 13:41:45 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 428181 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 296411, 391501, 391521, 607248, 634813, 699280, 727267, 729766, 747123, 756082 |
Description
Russell Harrison
2006-10-04 18:30:19 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux major release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Major release. This request is not yet committed for inclusion. This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release. I believe we can do this for 5.2 QE ack for RHEL5.2. Sounds like we have the hardware in-house and just need to sort out configuration. We're going to need OpenSSL changes for EAP-FAST as well since openssl doesn't fully support RFC 4851... *** Bug 190640 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** I am in the same boat with EAP-FAST support. I was able to get NM to connect to this EAP-FAST wireless network once, but nothing since then. I am able to connect to the above network with wpa_supplicant. Below is the configuration: network={ ssid="wlan" proto=RSN key_mgmt=WPA-EAP pairwise=CCMP eap=LEAP identity="daly" password="password" ca_cert="" mode=0 disabled=0 } This configuration was generated through wpa_gui. I see from the above that RHEL 5.2 was to have support for this type of network. I'm currently 5.2 but am still having issues. Development Management has reviewed and declined this request. You may appeal this decision by reopening this request. Ugh, shouldn't have been automatically closed WONTFIX, sorry. Still a valid bug; just postponed a bit. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 428181 *** Support is missing in F9 and F10 as well for EAP-FAST. (In reply to comment #31) > Support is missing in F9 and F10 as well for EAP-FAST. Yeah, but it's not gonna show up in F9 or F10 unless openssl gets updated there too. openssl now has EAP-FAST support NM still doesn't list EAP-FAST as an option in F11. I don't have a production EAP-FAST system available, but I'm pretty sure until that option is there, NM is still dead when it comes to EAP-FAST. openssl now supports EAP-FAST, please update NM to support it also I see this BZ is filed against RHEL6, but I also see previous bugs closed as dupes of this that were filed against Fedora, so I'm not sure if this is the most appropriate place to ask about the status of this in F16 as well. Can anyone provide any insight into EAP-FAST support in F16? This BZ looks like it is tentatively flagged for RHEL 6.3, but that doesn't help too much with understanding the when this may land in Fedora. Upstream commits to 0.8.x branch that we need to backport for this: NM 91a58738622c30130a2f6dfa68da3a971a596534 8679f350e901282c22c7b0da5841588f4d3306e5 81a668ba3106913e2bb233217cca89965276fd3d editor 0285856d58e5eff391bcf324b63d7985fd4c77a2 And this commit from 0.8.x branch too: dd562a3dc4eeb7ee64a1835bbf146985a9c91957 And also these commits from 0.8.x branch: fec7fc4e01b113651ebb5486d9100245bd78f374 977e0db633d17dcb6e9324704d275d5475981cb8 ef9ef7133f0cccadd0ccd2cf57d9bea8aeebbd41 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0832.html |