Bug 2144657

Summary:	Please provide libqxp-devel for EPEL 9 (until in CRB 9)
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla>
Component:	libqxp-epel	Assignee:	Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel9	CC:	dtardon, redhat-bugzilla
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Reopened
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	libqxp-epel-0.0.2-0.11.el9.1	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-12-19 00:38:43 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1914423, 2144650

Description Robert Scheck 2022-11-21 23:35:20 UTC

Please branch and build libqxp in epel9.

If you do not wish to maintain libqxp in epel9, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package; please add the epel-packagers-sig group through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libqxp/addgroup and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.

Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2022-11-21 23:38:22 UTC

For me, a rebuild of libqxp-0.0.2-15.fc37 worked.

Comment 2 David Tardon 2022-11-22 07:38:56 UTC

This package is already present in RHEL 9 / CentOS Stream 9.

Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2022-11-22 08:46:28 UTC

I'm sorry, but I can not find libqxp-devel to build scribus.

Comment 4 Robert Scheck 2022-11-22 09:36:54 UTC

Ah, this is one of the RHEL peculiarities. I've filed bug #2144768 to get libqxp-devel added to CRB 9 (and thus later to RHEL 9). For the mean time, I'm changing this RHBZ to request the short-term solution as per https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-missing-sub-packages/#short_term to hopefully get scribus before RHEL 9.2 into EPEL 9. Please let me know if you are not interested in the short-term solution, then I'll work on this myself.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2022-12-10 02:23:06 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a7ea044d93 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a7ea044d93

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2022-12-11 02:21:48 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a7ea044d93 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a7ea044d93

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2022-12-19 00:38:43 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a7ea044d93 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.