Bug 2156779

Summary:	Please provide miller for EPEL-9
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Gerd v. Egidy <gerd>
Component:	miller	Assignee:	Stephen Kitt <steve>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel9	CC:	michel, steve
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	miller-5.10.2-1.el9	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2024-05-16 00:40:24 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1914423

Description Gerd v. Egidy 2022-12-28 17:08:06 UTC

Description of problem:

miller is currently being provided for EPEL-8, but not for EPEL-9. Please build the package for EPEL-9 too. It looks to me like it won't be difficult to build it on EL9.

I like miller to work with CSV files in shell scripts. miller not being available on EL9 makes migrating more difficult.

Comment 1 Michel Lind 2024-04-23 23:28:50 UTC

This builds just fine in EPEL 9: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=116794752

Could you branch and build for epel9?

If you do not wish to maintain miller in epel9,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
the EPEL Packagers SIG and Go SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package;
please add the epel-packagers-sig group and the go-sig group through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/miller/addgroup

- grant go-sig commit access
- grant epel-packagers-sig collaborator access on epel* branches.

I would also be happy to be a co-maintainer (FAS: salimma);
please add me through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/miller/adduser

Comment 2 Stephen Kitt 2024-05-03 08:48:10 UTC

Apologies for the delay, I’ve pushed a build for EPEL 9.

@michel I’ve added you as a co-maintainer, thanks! I’ve been working on and off on getting the Go dependencies ready so that we can switch to Miller 6, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215517

Comment 3 Michel Lind 2024-05-07 20:17:28 UTC

(In reply to Stephen Kitt from comment #2)
> Apologies for the delay, I’ve pushed a build for EPEL 9.
> 
> @michel I’ve added you as a co-maintainer, thanks! I’ve been
> working on and off on getting the Go dependencies ready so that we can
> switch to Miller 6, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215517

thank you! Could you add go-sig to Miller as well? Since Miller 6 is ported to go, the Go SIG will likely be happy to comaintain it.

Comment 4 Michel Lind 2024-05-07 20:18:02 UTC

*** Bug 2275819 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2024-05-07 20:18:50 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2024-2a421b2bf0 (miller-5.10.2-1.el9) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-2a421b2bf0

Comment 6 Michel Lind 2024-05-07 20:24:08 UTC

I've added epel-packagers-sig (collaborator on epel* only) and go-sig (for when v6 is ready). Will try and take a look at the review request

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2024-05-08 00:32:04 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2024-2a421b2bf0 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-2a421b2bf0

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2024-05-16 00:40:24 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2024-2a421b2bf0 (miller-5.10.2-1.el9) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.