Bug 2156779 - Please provide miller for EPEL-9
Summary: Please provide miller for EPEL-9
Keywords:
Status: ON_QA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: miller
Version: epel9
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Stephen Kitt
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 2275819 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: EPELPackagersSIG
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-12-28 17:08 UTC by Gerd v. Egidy
Modified: 2024-05-08 00:32 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Gerd v. Egidy 2022-12-28 17:08:06 UTC
Description of problem:

miller is currently being provided for EPEL-8, but not for EPEL-9. Please build the package for EPEL-9 too. It looks to me like it won't be difficult to build it on EL9.

I like miller to work with CSV files in shell scripts. miller not being available on EL9 makes migrating more difficult.

Comment 1 Michel Lind 2024-04-23 23:28:50 UTC
This builds just fine in EPEL 9: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=116794752

Could you branch and build for epel9?

If you do not wish to maintain miller in epel9,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
the EPEL Packagers SIG and Go SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package;
please add the epel-packagers-sig group and the go-sig group through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/miller/addgroup

- grant go-sig commit access
- grant epel-packagers-sig collaborator access on epel* branches.

I would also be happy to be a co-maintainer (FAS: salimma);
please add me through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/miller/adduser

Comment 2 Stephen Kitt 2024-05-03 08:48:10 UTC
Apologies for the delay, I’ve pushed a build for EPEL 9.

@michel I’ve added you as a co-maintainer, thanks! I’ve been working on and off on getting the Go dependencies ready so that we can switch to Miller 6, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215517

Comment 3 Michel Lind 2024-05-07 20:17:28 UTC
(In reply to Stephen Kitt from comment #2)
> Apologies for the delay, I’ve pushed a build for EPEL 9.
> 
> @michel I’ve added you as a co-maintainer, thanks! I’ve been
> working on and off on getting the Go dependencies ready so that we can
> switch to Miller 6, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215517

thank you! Could you add go-sig to Miller as well? Since Miller 6 is ported to go, the Go SIG will likely be happy to comaintain it.

Comment 4 Michel Lind 2024-05-07 20:18:02 UTC
*** Bug 2275819 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2024-05-07 20:18:50 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-2a421b2bf0 (miller-5.10.2-1.el9) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-2a421b2bf0

Comment 6 Michel Lind 2024-05-07 20:24:08 UTC
I've added epel-packagers-sig (collaborator on epel* only) and go-sig (for when v6 is ready). Will try and take a look at the review request

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2024-05-08 00:32:04 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-2a421b2bf0 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-2a421b2bf0

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.